Today : 2026³â 06¿ù 30ÀÏ (È­¿äÀÏ) ·Î±×ÀΠ     ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ
Ȩ      33333               22222               Áß°í ÆÄ¶ó¼Ö ÆÇ¸Å              

  È¨     »ç¿ªºñÁ¯     Á¶Á÷  

Ȩ
  glory


  ºü¸¥°Ë»ö

½Å¹® ÀâÁö

»ýȰÁ¤º¸

Ȩ

33333
2009-06-10 17:45:46




µ¶ÀÚ ÇѸ¶µð
YpaNtcnH
Anton kirbywbf@lycos.com
YpaNtcnH
Johnathon maynardy55@aol.com
YpaNtcnH
Connie jerry2y@lycos.com
WYPUcNOlDRO
I enjoy travelling animals names Why? The short answer is Russia’s Security Council veto. For those of us who were involved in the Iraq and Kosovo crises, the current arguments about Syria carry haunting resonance. In all those cases there have been widespread demands that any action taken should be “legal”. The canonical interpretation of that much argued word is “in accordance with the UN Charter”. But the Charter is inconveniently clear on the justifications for using force. There are just two: either you are attacked or you get Security Council authorisation. And on none of these issues was Russia going to allow Security Council assent to the use of armed force.
Gonzalo ralphh87@gmail.com
WYPUcNOlDRO
Roderick winston6u@aol.com
WYPUcNOlDRO
Behappy miltonvak@gmail.com
WYPUcNOlDRO
Hunter randolphf21@lycos.com
WYPUcNOlDRO
Kermit avery8d@usa.net
WYPUcNOlDRO
Darren demetriusp61@yahoo.com
WYPUcNOlDRO
Harvey thanhrxv@lycos.com
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]



ÇÁ¸°Æ®Çϱ⠱â»ç¸ÞÀϺ¸³»±â


ÀÌÀüÀ¸·Î
°ü·Ã±â»ç°¡ ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.